Post
#117 March 26, 2018
“Automated
Storytelling”
Today, bots are writing stories in place or of in
collaboration with human authors. For
the most part, this is more prevalent in journalism and the newspaper
business. With software like Buzzbot and
Heliograph, journalists now have newsroom associates that are actually just
algorithms, helping them craft stories from disparate facts.
Why are newspapers doing this? Speed.
Efficiency. Cost. Some news stories are better automated than
others. When a type of story can be
crafted from highly structured data, with well-defined patterns, easily
understood templates, algorithms can help.
Examples might be sports recaps, stock market reports, some types of new
stories like accidents, fires, routine police cases. In all these cases, the foundation of the
story consists of a set of fairly well-defined facts and the writing normally
adheres to a well-understood pattern, or template.
Download the facts, select the temple and press
START. Out comes a story. It may need a little editing but then so do
stories done by human writers.
Is such a thing possible in the world of
fiction? It is and it’s happening now.
From the website Mashable.com, comes this little
gem:
Deep inside an MIT laboratory, an artificially
intelligent bot is composing ghastly tales of nightmarish creatures and strange
shrieks in the night.
MIT researchers named their bot Shelley (after Frankenstein author Mary
Shelley). They endowed her with an artificial mind, called a neural network, an advanced
form of machine learning in which a computer learns a task by relying on
training examples. In Shelley's case, MIT researchers fed her silicon brain
140,000 horror stories published by writers on Reddit's "No Sleep" forum.
Endowed with this
massive story bank of fright, Shelley is a program that churns out its own
unique tales of the undead and soon-to-be dead.
"She's creating really interesting and weird stories
that have never really existed in the horror genre," Pinar Yanardag, a
researcher at the MIT Media Lab, told the Associated Press. Pinar gives the example of a man who
awakes in a hospital bed to find he's pregnant.
Another of Shelley's stories begins: I had no choice but to get out. I turned
around and saw my mom. She had a menacing look on her face, holding a small box
with my dad's stuffed animals in it.
But Shelley doesn't just concoct fictional
dread by herself. Her MIT creators encourage Twitter users to interact with the
hell-bot. Each hour, Shelley tweets the beginning lines to
a story. Real humans can reply with the story's next lines,
which Shelley will read and add to.
Shelley's MIT creators hope her autonomously-generated
text will provide answers to an important question about AI: "Can machines
learn to scare us?"
As the machine receives more feedback from interactions
from humans, it learns how to fashion authentic terror — or at least,
that's how it's designed. This isn't too different from AI neural networks
learning to render realistic faces or dominate popular board games.
Shelley may not be truly terrifying just yet. But beware:
In the deep witching hours when you're asleep, she's wide awake — and training
to become even more horrifying.
As a writer of science
fiction and horror, I find this idea both compelling and a bit horrifying
myself. Could the bots be taking over
the formerly sacred precincts of fiction writing? Could these artificial storytellers possibly
be convinced to help aspiring authors craft even better stories?
I can think of five ways
storytelling bots might help fiction writers.
- Speed of writing – get your drafts done and edited in record time. Put in some details, select a template and voila!
- Generating plot twists – with enough plot templates (and let’s face it, there’s a lot of formula in genre fiction), you could vary the complications in your story in such a way as to surprise even the most jaded reader. Clive Cussler, look out.
- Generating character bios – writing extensive character background is something I do a lot of as it helps in writing series fiction, where you have recurring characters and you have to be consistent to be believable. If had some templates for character biographical background, I could plug in some basic facts (appearance, personality type, key events in their life) and let the bot do the rest. Call it BioBot. That would definitely make my life easier.
- Help with story outlines – I do extensive outlines of my stories ahead of time. I call them Chapter and Scene Details. If a bot could help me flesh out my outlines, with help from the Plot Twist Bot (maybe these are the same), I could save days off my prep time and spend my afternoon hours on the back deck, watching the birds and planes with a beer in my hand. Load all my character bios, select certain templates, set parameters on action and press START. It’s nirvana.
- Grabbing setting details off the Net – this is putting my bots to work as research associates, gathering facts, details, quirky bits of information that can add realism to a story, even if it’s set on the planet Tralfamadore (apologies to Kurt Vonnegut).
Could bots replace a writer’s
unique, memorable, even edgy word sense?
Could bots simulate a Faulkner, a Mark Twain, a Stephen King? I’m thinking the answer is no, at least not
yet. I think the best use for fiction
bots is as a research assistant and copy editor. Bots could definitely help in editing and
already do, with spellcheck and online grammar-checking and auto-correct
functions. Maybe our bots could help in
a deeper story sense, with balancing narrative against action scenes and
recommendations on pacing.
In my book, fiction bots have
a definite role and are definitely coming, in some form. They can best help us humanoid writers in
planning, outlining, character bios, setting details, editing and adherence to
genre styles and traditions, just like the Shelley bot above.
For now, though, the humans
should stay firmly in control of the story.
Due to the Easter holiday, the next post to The Word Shed comes on April 9, 2018.
See you then.
Phil B.